ABSTRACT
Background As far as we know, there are no reports comparing the safety and cough frequency of transnasal bronchoscopy (TNB) with transoral bronchoscopy (TOB). Methods The subjects were 50 patients who underwent either TNB or TOB and completed the pain score questionnaire between May and November 2020. Complications, pain scores, and cough frequency (times per minute) were compared between the patients with TNB and TOB. A surgical mask was worn over the mouthpiece during the examination. Results Thirty-two and 18 patients underwent TNB and TOB, respectively. Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in examination time and frequency of serious complications. In pain scores, there were no significant differences in terms of anesthesia suffering, several pains during the examination, and availability of re-examination. The TNB group did not feel the prolonged examination time compared to the TOB group (p=0.04). Cough frequency was lower in the TNB group than in the TOB group (0.36 vs 0.73, p=0.027). Moreover, cough frequency in the 25 TNB patients who underwent thin bronchoscopy was significantly lower (0.19 vs 0.73, p<0.01). Conclusions TNB with a surgical mask was well tolerated and safe. Cough frequency in the transnasal thin bronchoscopy was extremely low, suggesting aerosol reduction can be expected.
ABSTRACT
A 60-year-old man presented with dyspnea four days after the second dose of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine. Imaging revealed extensive ground-glass opacification. Blood tests were notable for elevated KL-6 levels. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis showed increased lymphocyte-dominant inflammatory cells and decreased CD4/CD8 ratio. These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD). To the best of our knowledge, this has never been reported in previous literature. Treatment with glucocorticoids relieved his symptoms. This paper highlights that although extremely rare, COVID-19 vaccine could cause DIILD, and early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to improve patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , COVID-19 Vaccines , Dyspnea , Humans , Lung , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/chemically induced , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Background and objective Due to the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the Japanese Society of Respiratory Endoscopy recommended the omission of throat anesthesia using Jackson's spray prior to bronchoscopy for preventing aerosol generation. In this survey, we investigated the tolerability of patients toward the omission of anesthesia using Jackson's spray before bronchoscopy. Methods Group A patients received throat anesthesia with 5 mL of 4% lidocaine using Jackson's spray prior to bronchoscopy and were then administered pethidine hydrochloride and midazolam intravenously. Group B patients did not receive anesthesia using Jackson's spray before bronchoscopy. They were administered pethidine hydrochloride and midazolam and were then administered 8% lidocaine several times into the pharynx. A patient distress questionnaire, classified as a five-graded score, was administered to each group after bronchoscopy. Results Seventy patients participated in this study: 39 patients in Group A and 31 patients in Group B. There were no significant differences in their backgrounds. In the questionnaire survey, the distress caused by pre-examination anesthesia in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B (3.03 ± 1.25 vs. 1.23 ± 0.62; p < 0.0001), and no significant differences were observed in the other questions during bronchoscopy. Conclusion This study demonstrates the tolerability of patients toward the omission of throat anesthesia using Jackson's spray prior to bronchoscopy, which is recommended for preventing infection, including COVID-19.